|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title: |
Case Assignment History Report US District Court Eastern District of Virginia Report Date 4/11/13 |
|
Author: |
Theresa Buchanan, Thomas Rawles Jones |
|
Title: |
United States Magistrate Judge |
|
Authoring or Creator Agency: |
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
|
Concerning: |
"2703(d) Orders Under Seal in EDVA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title: |
Case Assignment History Report US District Court Eastern District of Virginia Report Date 4/11/13 |
|
Author: |
Theresa Buchanan, Thomas Rawles Jones |
|
Title: |
United States Magistrate Judge |
|
Authoring or Creator Agency: |
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
|
Concerning: |
"2703(d) Orders Under Seal in EDVA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title: |
ORDERED that Petitioners' Motion to Stay and Injunction Pending Appeal 89 be and is hereby DENIED. Because resolution of this motion requires no argument, the Clerk shall remove the hearing set for 1/13/2011 from the calendar. Signed by District Judge Liam O'Grady on 1/4/2012. (jcor) (Entered: 01/05/2012) |
|
Concerning: |
"Twitter 2703(d), 2703(d) Orders, Grand Jury |
|
|
Title: |
U.S. District Court Eastern District of Virginia (Alexandria) CRIMINAL DOCKET FOR CASE #- 1-11dm00003TCBLO All Defendants.pdf |
|
Concerning: |
"Twitter 2703(d), 2703(d) Orders, Grand Jury |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title: |
MEMORANDUM OPINION The Court concludes that a stay and injunction are not appropriate at this time. Petitioners' motion is therefore DENIED. Signed by District Judge Liam O'Grady on 1/4/2012. (jcor) (Entered: 01/05/2012) |
|
Concerning: |
"Twitter 2703(d), 2703(d) Orders, Grand Jury |
|
|
Title: |
U.S. District Court Eastern District of Virginia (Alexandria) CRIMINAL DOCKET FOR CASE #- 1-11dm00003TCBLO All Defendants.pdf |
|
Concerning: |
"Twitter 2703(d), 2703(d) Orders, Grand Jury |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title: |
MEMORANDUM OPINION as to Jacob Appelbaum, Rop Gonggrijp, Birgitta Jonsdottir, Twitter, Inc. Petitioners' Motion is DENIED. Signed by District Judge Liam O'Grady on 1/4/2012. (jcor) (Entered: 01/06/2012) |
|
Concerning: |
"Twitter 2703(d), 2703(d) Orders, Grand Jury |
|
|
Title: |
U.S. District Court Eastern District of Virginia (Alexandria) CRIMINAL DOCKET FOR CASE #- 1-11dm00003TCBLO All Defendants.pdf |
|
Concerning: |
"Twitter 2703(d), 2703(d) Orders, Grand Jury |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title: |
DISTRICT COURT UPDATE. ORDERED that Petitioners' Motion to Stay and Injunction Pending Appeal [89] be and is hereby DENIED. Because resolution of this motion requires no argument, the Clerk shall remove the hearing set for 1/13/2011 from the calendar. Signed by District Judge L [11-5151] (JB) |
|
Concerning: |
"Twitter 2703(d), 2703(d) Orders, Grand Jury |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title: |
Justice Department Charges Leaders of Megaupload with Widespread Online Copyright Infringement |
|
Authoring or Creator Agency: |
Office of Public Affairs, Department of Justice |
|
Concerning: |
"Megupload |
|
|
|
Archive Link |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title: |
Case Assignment History Report US District Court Eastern District of Virginia Report Date 4/11/13 |
|
Author: |
Ivan Davis |
|
Title: |
United States Magistrate Judge |
|
Authoring or Creator Agency: |
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
|
Concerning: |
"2703(d) Orders Under Seal in EDVA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title: |
Case Assignment History Report US District Court Eastern District of Virginia Report Date 4/11/13 |
|
Author: |
Ivan Davis |
|
Title: |
United States Magistrate Judge |
|
Authoring or Creator Agency: |
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
|
Concerning: |
"2703(d) Orders Under Seal in EDVA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On consideration of the writ-appeal petition; the motion filed by Baher Azmy, Esq., to appear pro hac vice; Appellant's motion to supplement the record; the motion for leave to file a joint appendix; and Appellee's motion to attach affidavit, it is, by the Court, this 11th day of January 2012,
ORDERED: That said motions are hereby granted; and That said writ-appeal petition is hereby denied.
For the Court,
/s/ William A. DeCicco Clerk of the Court |
|
Concerning: |
United States v. Pfc. Bradley Manning |
|
Url: |
Url Link
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title: |
Case Assignment History Report US District Court Eastern District of Virginia Report Date 4/11/13 |
|
Author: |
Ivan Davis |
|
Title: |
United States Magistrate Judge |
|
Authoring or Creator Agency: |
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
|
Concerning: |
"2703(d) Orders Under Seal in EDVA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title: |
Case Assignment History Report US District Court Eastern District of Virginia Report Date 4/11/13 |
|
Author: |
Ivan Davis |
|
Title: |
United States Magistrate Judge |
|
Authoring or Creator Agency: |
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
|
Concerning: |
"2703(d) Orders Under Seal in EDVA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
News Release
The U.S. Army Military District of Washington Guardian of the Nation's Capital
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE #12-01 DATE: January 12, 2012
Investigating Officer Provides Recommendation in the Article 32 Hearing ' U.S. Government vs. Pfc. Bradley E. Manning
FORT LESLEY J. MCNAIR, DC ' The investigating officer assigned to the Article 32 Hearing for Pfc. Bradley E. Manning forwarded his recommendation to Col. Carl R. Coffman, the Special Court Martial Convening Authority, on Jan. 12, 2012. The investigating officer concluded that the charges and specifications are in the proper form and that reasonable grounds exist to believe that the accused committed the offenses alleged. He recommended that the charges be referred to a general court martial.
The Special Court Martial Convening Authority will now review the investigating officer's report and determine whether the charges should be disposed of at his level or be forwarded to Maj. Gen. Michael S. Linnington, the General Court Martial Convening Authority for disposition at his level.
Pfc. Manning is charged with aiding the enemy; wrongfully causing intelligence to be published on the internet knowing that it is accessible to the enemy; theft of public property or records; transmitting defense information; fraud and related activity in connection with computers; and for violating Army Regulations 25-2 'Information Assurance' and 380-5 'Department of the Army Information Security Program.'
If convicted of all charges, Manning would face a maximum punishment of reduction to the lowest enlisted pay grade, E-1; total forfeiture of all pay and allowances; confinement for life; and a dishonorable discharge.
Media queries may be emailed to the U.S. Army Military District of Washington Public Affairs Office at mediadesk@jfhqncr.northcom.mil.
Read more here: http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2012/01/12/135689/manning-should-face-court-martial.html#.UZUGJSs4VsU#storylink=cpy |
|
Agency(ies): |
Military District of Washington, Department of Defense |
|
Concerning: |
United States v. Pfc. Bradley Manning |
|
Url: |
Url Link
|
|
Archive: |
Archive Link
http://archive.is/05E1E |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a.) XXXXXXXXXX [ JAMES CULKY (sp.), 4TH CALVARY DIVISION, BRIGADE S2 ] He will testify about his classification review of the three Apache gun videos that were sent to his Division by FORSCOM. Specifically, he will testify that the videos were not classified at the time of their alleged release. However, he will testify that he believes that videos should have been classified. He will also testify regarding his classification determination. The requested deposition is needed due to the Article 32 Investigating Officer's [ Lt. Col. Paul Almanza ] improper determination that XXXXXXXXXX [ JAMES CULKY (sp.), 4TH CALVARY DIVISION, BRIGADE S2 ] was not reasonably available at the Article 32 hearing. XXXXXXXXXX [ JAMES CULKY (sp.), 4TH CALVARY DIVISION, BRIGADE S2 ] was an essential witness and should have been produced in person at the Article 32 hearing. Additionally, given the fact XXXXXXXXXX [ JAMES CULKY (sp.), 4TH CALVARY DIVISION, BRIGADE S2 ] believes the matter that the Defense wishes to discuss with him is classified, the government needs to arrange for a proper location for the deposition. The Defense requests that an oral deposition be conducted.
b.) XXXXXXXXXX[ REAR ADMIRAL KEVIN DONEGAN, DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS, USCENTCOM ]. XXXXXXXXXX[ REAR ADMIRAL KEVIN DONEGAN, DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS, USCENTCOM ] conducted classification reviews on two PowerPoint slide presentations of official reports originated by USCENTCOM. The PowerPoint presentations are the subject of Specification 10 of Charge II. XXXXXXXXXX [ REAR ADMIRAL KEVIN DONEGAN, DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS, USCENTCOM ] will testify regarding his classification determination and his belief of the impact on national security due to the release of the information. The requested deposition is needed due to the Article 32 Investigating Officer's [ Lt. Col. Paul Almanza ] improper determination that XXXXXXXXXX [ REAR ADMIRAL KEVIN DONEGAN, DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS, USCENTCOM ] was not reasonably available at the Article 32 hearing. XXXXXXXXXX [ REAR ADMIRAL KEVIN DONEGAN, DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS, USCENTCOM ] was essential witness and should have been produced in person at the Article 32 hearing. Additionally, given the classified nature of his testimony, the government needs to arrange for a proper location for the deposition. The Defense requests that an oral deposition be conducted.
c.) XXXXXXXXXX [MR. BETTS, CHIEF CLASSIFICATION OFFICER, US CYBER COMMAND ]. XXXXXXXXXX [ MR. BETTS, CHIEF CLASSIFICATION OFFICER, US CYBER COMMAND ] will testify about his classification determination concerning XXXXXXXXXX [ THE ALLEGED CHAT LOGS BETWEEN ADRIAN LAMO AND BRADLEY MANNING ]. Specifically, he will testify about his classification assessment of information discussed in XXXXXXXXXX [ THE ALLEGED CHAT LOGS ]. The requested deposition is needed due to the Article 32 Investigating Officer's [ Lt. Col. Paul Almanza ] improper determination that XXXXXXXXXX [ MR. BETTS, CHIEF CLASSIFICATION OFFICER, US CYBER COMMAND ] was not reasonably available at the Article 32 hearing. XXXXXXXXXX [ MR. BETTS, CHIEF CLASSIFICATION OFFICER, US CYBER COMMAND ] was an essential witness and should have been produced in person at the Article 32 hearing. Additionally, given the classified nature of his testimony, the government needs to arrange for a proper location for the deposition. The Defense requests that an oral deposition be conducted.
d.) XXXXXXXXXX [ ROBERT E. SCHMIDLE, DEPUTY COMMANDER, US CYBERCOM ]. XXXXXXXXXX [ ROBERT E. SCHMIDLE, DEPUTY COMMANDER, US CYBERCOM ] is the Original Classification Authority (OCA) over the information discussed by XXXXXXXXXX [ MR. BETTS, CHIEF CLASSIFICATION OFFICER, US CYBER COMMAND ]. XXXXXXXXXX [ ROBERT E. SCHMIDLE, DEPUTY COMMANDER, US CYBERCOM ] will testify that he concurs with the classification determination and impact statements made XXXXXXXXXX [ MR. BETTS, US CYBER COMMAND ]. The Defense would like to question him regarding his declaration and the basis of his belief. The requested deposition is needed due to the Article 32 Investigating Officer's [ Lt. Col. Paul Almanza ] improper determination that XXXXXXXXXX [ ROBERT E. SCHMIDLE, DEPUTY COMMANDER, US CYBERCOM ] was not reasonably available at the Article 32 hearing. XXXXXXXXXX [ ROBERT E. SCHMIDLE, DEPUTY COMMANDER, US CYBERCOM ] was an essential witness and should have been produced in person at the Article 32 hearing. Additionally, given the classified nature of his testimony, the government needs to arrange for a proper location for the deposition. The Defense requests that an oral deposition be conducted.
e.) XXXXXXXXXX [ VICE ADMIRAL ROBERT S. HARWARD, DEPUTY COMMANDER, US CENTRAL COMMANDER, US CENTRAL COMMAND (USCENTCOM) ]. XXXXXXXXXX [ VICE ADMIRAL ROBERT S. HARWARD, DEPUTY COMMANDER, US CENTRAL COMMANDER, US CENTRAL COMMAND (USCENTCOM) ] will testify concerning his classification review and classification determination concerning the CIDNE Afghanistan Events, CIDNE Iraq Events, other briefings and the BE22PAX.wmv video [Garani Air Strike Video]. Specifically, XXXXXXXXXX [ VICE ADMIRAL ROBERT S. HARWARD, DEPUTY COMMANDER, US CENTRAL COMMANDER, US CENTRAL COMMAND (USCENTCOM) ] will testify concerning his classification determination and his belief of the impact on national security from having this information released to the public. The requested deposition is needed due to the Article 32 Investigating Officer's [Lt. Col. Paul Almanza] improper determination XXXXXXXXXX [ VICE ADMIRAL ROBERT S. HARWARD, DEPUTY COMMANDER, US CENTRAL COMMANDER, US CENTRAL COMMAND (USCENTCOM) ] was not reasonably available at the Article 32 hearing. XXXXXXXXXX [ VICE ADMIRAL ROBERT S. HARWARD, DEPUTY COMMANDER, US CENTRAL COMMANDER, US CENTRAL COMMAND (USCENTCOM) ] was an essential witness and should have been produced in person at the Article 32 hearing. Additionally, given the classifed nature of his testimony, the government needs to arrange for a proper location for the deposition. The Defense requests that an oral deposition be conducted.
f.) XXXXXXXXXX [ PATRICK F. KENNEDY, UNDER SECRETARY, MANAGEMENT, DEPARTMENT OF STATE ]. XXXXXXXXXX [ PATRICK F. KENNEDY, UNDER SECRETARY, MANAGEMENT, DEPARTMENT OF STATE ] will testify concerning his review of the disclosure of Department of State Diplomatic Cables stored within the Net-Centric will testify concerning his Diplomacy server and part of SIPDIS. XXXXXXXXXX [ PATRICK F. KENNEDY, UNDER SECRETARY, MANAGEMENT, DEPARTMENT OF STATE ] will testify concerning his classification determination and the impact of the release of the information on national security. The requested deposition is needed due to the Article 32 Investigating Officer's [ Lt. Col. Paul Almanza ] improper determination that XXXXXXXXXX [ PATRICK F. KENNEDY, UNDER SECRETARY, MANAGEMENT, DEPARTMENT OF STATE ] was not reasonably available for the Article 32 hearing. XXXXXXXXXX [ PATRICK F. KENNEDY, UNDER SECRETARY, MANAGEMENT, DEPARTMENT OF STATE ] was an essential witness and should have been produced in person hearing. Additionally, given the classified nature of his testimony, the government needs to arrange for a proper location for the deposition. The Defense requests that an oral deposition be conducted. |
|
Name(s:) |
Alexa O'Brien |
|
Title: |
Journalist |
|
Concerning: |
United States v. Pfc. Bradley Manning |
|
Url: |
Url Link
|
|
Archive: |
Archive Link
http://archive.is/x1CvR |
|
Author: |
David Coombs |
|
Title: |
civilian defense counsel |
|
Concerning: |
"United States v. Pfc. Bradley Manning |
|
|
|
Archive Link |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title: |
Case Assignment History Report US District Court Eastern District of Virginia Report Date 4/11/13 |
|
Author: |
Ivan Davis |
|
Title: |
United States Magistrate Judge |
|
Authoring or Creator Agency: |
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
|
Concerning: |
"2703(d) Orders Under Seal in EDVA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title: |
Investigating Officer Recommends Court-martial for Manning |
|
Authoring or Creator Agency: |
Armed Forces Press Service, Department of Defense |
|
Concerning: |
"United States v. Pfc. Bradley Manning |
|
|
|
Archive Link |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title: |
Case Assignment History Report US District Court Eastern District of Virginia Report Date 4/11/13 |
|
Author: |
Ivan Davis |
|
Title: |
United States Magistrate Judge |
|
Authoring or Creator Agency: |
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
|
Concerning: |
"2703(d) Orders Under Seal in EDVA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a.) XXXXXXXXXX [ REAR ADMIRAL DAVID B. WOODS, COMMANDER, JOINT TASK FORCE GUANTANAMO ]. XXXXXXXXXX [ REAR ADMIRAL DAVID B. WOODS, COMMANDER, JOINT TASK FORCE GUANTANAMO ] will testify review of the disclosure of five documents, totaling twenty-two pages. XXXXXXXXXX [ REAR ADMIRAL DAVID B. WOODS, COMMANDER, JOINT TASK FORCE GUANTANAMO ] will testify concerning his classification determination and his belief regarding the impact of the release of information on national security. The requested deposition is needed due to the Article 32 Investigating Officer's [ Lt. Col. Paul Almanza ] improper determination that XXXXXXXXXX [ REAR ADMIRAL DAVID B. WOODS, COMMANDER, JOINT TASK FORCE GUANTANAMO ] was not reasonably available. XXXXXXXXXX [ REAR ADMIRAL DAVID B. WOODS, COMMANDER, JOINT TASK FORCE GUANTANAMO ] was an essential witness and should have been produced in person at the Article 32 hearing. Additionally, given the classified nature of his testimony, the Government needs to arrange for a proper location for the deposition. The Defense requests that an oral deposition be conducted. (Source: March 16, 2012 Article 39(a) Session)
b.) XXXXXXXXXX [ ROBERT ROWLAND (sp.) ]. XXXXXXXXXX [ ROBERT ROWLAND (sp.) ] will testify concerning his review of two memoranda produced by a United States government intelligence agency. XXXXXXXXXX [ ROBERT ROWLAND (sp.) ] will testify concerning his classification determination and his belief regarding the impact of the release of the information on national security. The requested deposition is need due to the XXXXXXXXXX [ WHAT IS THIS? ] not being produced by the government at the Article 32 hearing. XXXXXXXXXX [ ROBERT ROWLAND (sp.) ] was an essential witness and should have been produced in person at the Article 32 hearing. Additionally, given the classified nature of his testament, the government needs to arrange for a proper location for the depositions. The defense requests that an oral deposition be conducted.
According to the defense's February 16, 2012 Motion to Compel Depositions, defense requested seven Original Classification Authorities (OCAs) as witnesses for their December 2, 2011 Request for Article 32 Witnesses.
Witnesses No. 39 to 45 represent the seven Original Classification Authorities (OCAs) on the December 2, 2011 Defense Request for Article 32 Witnesses list.
According to the defense's February 16, 2012 Motion to Compel Depositions, a 'subsequent Original Classification Authority OCA was requested as soon as his identity was known to the Defense.'
At the March 16, 2012 Article 39(a) Session the names of eight individual Original Classification Authorities (OCAs) were revealed with the addition of Robert Rowland (sp.).
Judge Lind, in her ruling on the February 16, 2012 Motion to Compel Depositions, gave descriptions for each of the eight the eight individuals except for h.) Robert Rowland (.sp), whose description was redacted from open Court, but who is described in the defense's February 16, 2012 Motion to Compel Depositions as 'not being produced by the Government [not the Investigating Officer, as were every other named individual according to defense filings] at the Article 32 hearings ' - meaning Rowland (sp.) was a 'subsequent Original Classification Authority OCA [that] was requested as soon as his identity was known to the Defense.'
In this January 16, 2011 Supplement to Defense Request to the Government for Oral Depositions [see b.) above] Rowland is similarly described.
Specification 3 of Charge II refers to 'more than one classified memorandum produced by a United States government intelligence agency,' which Pfc. Bradley Manning is alleged to have had 'unauthorized possession of' on or about 22 March 2010 and on or about 26 March 2010.
On March 26, 2010 WikiLeaks published 'CIA report into shoring up Afghan war support in Western Europe' On August 28, 2010, WikiLeaks published 'CIA Red Cell Memorandum on United States 'exporting terrorism' Both documents are the only CIA documents published on the WikiLeaks.org web site between the charge dates, which coincide with Pfc. Bradley Manning's deployment to Iraq.
Robert Rowland performed a classification review of for the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA).
c.) 'XXXXXXXXXX [ ROBERT GATES, FORMER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE ] will testify that the Afghanistan and Iraq SIGACTs releases did not reveal any sensitive intelligence sources or methods. He will also testify that the Department of Defense could not point to anyone in Afghanistan or Iraq harmed due to the documents released by WikiLeaks. He will testify that the Afghanistan and Iraq SIGACTs are simply ground-level field reports that document dated activities which do not disclose sensitive information or our sources and methods. XXXXXXXXXX[ ROBERT GATES, FORMER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE ] will also testify that the initial public descriptions of the harm to foreign policy due to the publication of diplomatic cables were 'fairly significantly overwrought.' He will also testify that although the disclosures were embarrassing and awkward, they did not represent significant consequences to foreign policy. Finally, XXXXXXXXXX [ ROBERT GATES, FORMER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE] will testify that on 29 July 2010, he directed the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) to lead a comprehensive review of the documents allegedly given to WikiLeaks and to coordinate under the Information Review Task Force (IRTF, formerly TF 725) to conduct a complete damage review. He will testify that the damage review confirmed that the alleged leaks represented a low to at best moderate risk to national security. Specifically, that all of the information allegedly leaked was either dated, represented low-level opinions, or was already commonly understood and know due to previous public disclosures.' The requested deposition is needed due to the Article 32 Investigating Officer's [Lt. Col. Paul Almanza] improper determination that XXXXXXXXXX [ ROBERT GATES, FORMER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE] was not reasonably available at the Article 32 hearing. XXXXXXXXXX [ ROBERT GATES, FORMER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE] was an essential witness and should have been produced in person at the Article 32 hearing. [For 'fairly significantly overwrought' quote, see DOD News Briefing with Secretary Gates and Adm. Mullen from the Pentagon, November 30, 2010]
d.) XXXXXXXXXX [ SECRETARY OF STATE HILLARY CLINTON ] will testify that she has raised the issue of the disclosure of diplomatic cables with foreign leaders 'in order to assure our colleagues that it will not in any way interfere with American diplomacy or our commitment to continuing important work that is ongoing.' XXXXXXXXXX [ SECRETARY OF STATE HILLARY CLINTON ] will also testify, that she has not had any concerns expressed to her about whether any nation would not continue to work with the United States or would not continue to discuss important matters going forward due to the alleged leaks. As such, XXXXXXXXXX [ SECRETARY HILLARY CLINTON ] will testify, that although the leaks were embarrassing for the administration, that she concurs with XXXXXXXXXX opinion that they do not represent significant consequences to foreign policy. The requested deposition is needed due to the Article 32 Investigating Officer's [Lt. Col. Paul Almanza's ] improper determination that XXXXXXXXXX [ SECRETARY OF STATE HILLARY CLINTON was not reasonably available at the Article 32 hearing. XXXXXXXXXX [ SECRETARY OF STATE HILLARY CLINTON was an essential witness and should have been produced in person at the Article 32 hearing. |
|
Name(s:) |
Alexa O'Brien |
|
Title: |
Journalist |
|
Concerning: |
United States v. Pfc. Bradley Manning |
|
Url: |
Url Link
|
|
Archive: |
Archive Link
http://archive.is/VzCTP |
|
Author: |
David Coombs |
|
Title: |
civilian defense counsel |
|
Concerning: |
"United States v. Pfc. Bradley Manning |
|
|
|
Archive Link |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title: |
FOIA Requests Closed by OIP in January 2012 |
|
Authoring or Creator Agency: |
Department of Justice |
|
Concerning: |
"FOIA, Grand Jury |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title: |
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Docket#:11-5151 |
|
Concerning: |
"Twitter 2703(d), 2703(d) Orders, Grand Jury |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title: |
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Docket#:11-5151 |
|
Concerning: |
"Twitter 2703(d), 2703(d) Orders, Grand Jury |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title: |
Docket correction requested from John W. Keker and Rachael E. Meny for Jacob Appelbaum. Re: [<A HREF='_SERVLETURL_/docs1/00403712659' target='new' ONCLICK="return doDocPostURL('00403712659','115969');" >15</A>] appearance of counsel , [<A HREF='_SERVLETURL_/docs1/00403712662' target='new' ONCLICK="return doDocPostURL('00403712662','115969');" >16</A>] appearance of counsel. Access to appearance of counsel , appearance of counsel has been restricted to case participants... [11-5151] (MR) |
|
Concerning: |
"Twitter 2703(d), 2703(d) Orders, Grand Jury |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earlier today, Colonel Carl R. Coffman Jr., denied the defense's request to conduct oral depositions of nine essential witnesses. These same witnesses were requested by the defense at the Article 32 hearing, but denied by Lieutenant Colonel Paul Almanza. Each of the requested witnesses would have testified concerning whether the charged information was or was not classified and whether there was any harm to national security from this information becoming public.
Colonel Coffman determined that the difficulty, expense, and/or effect on military operations outweighed the significance of the expected testimony. This determination is difficult to comprehend given the nature of the charges against PFC Manning. Today's decision is yet another example of the government improperly impeding the defense's access to essential witnesses.
Based upon Colonel Coffman's decision, the defense intends to renew its request to depose these witnesses with the General Court-Martial Convening Authority, Major General Michael S. Linnington, and, if necessary, with the military judge. |
|
Name(s:) |
David Coombs |
|
Title: |
civilian defense counsel |
|
Concerning: |
United States v. Pfc. Bradley Manning |
|
Url: |
Url Link
|
|
Archive: |
Archive Link
http://archive.is/1PAXZ |
|
|
The Army says Col. Carl Coffman sent his recommendation Wednesday to Maj. Gen. Michael Linnington, commander of the Military District of Washington. Linnington will decide whether to order a trial for Pfc. Bradley Manning.
Coffman concurred with the presiding officer at Manning's preliminary hearing last month. The 24-year-old Crescent, Okla., native faces 22 counts, including aiding the enemy. |
|
Agency(ies): |
Associated Press, AP |
|
Concerning: |
United States v. Pfc. Bradley Manning |
|
Url: |
Url Link
|
|
Archive: |
Archive Link
http://archive.is/eEgaF |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title: |
APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL (Local Rule 46(c)) by Lindsay Kelly for US.[998767604] [11-5151] Lindsay Kelly |
|
Concerning: |
"Twitter 2703(d), 2703(d) Orders, Grand Jury |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title: |
Case Assignment History Report US District Court Eastern District of Virginia Report Date 4/11/13 |
|
Author: |
Thomas Rawles Jones |
|
Title: |
United States Magistrate Judge |
|
Authoring or Creator Agency: |
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
|
Concerning: |
"2703(d) Orders Under Seal in EDVA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title: |
Case Assignment History Report US District Court Eastern District of Virginia Report Date 4/11/13 |
|
Author: |
Thomas Rawles Jones |
|
Title: |
United States Magistrate Judge |
|
Authoring or Creator Agency: |
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
|
Concerning: |
"2703(d) Orders Under Seal in EDVA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title: |
Case Assignment History Report US District Court Eastern District of Virginia Report Date 4/11/13 |
|
Author: |
Thomas Rawles Jones |
|
Title: |
United States Magistrate Judge |
|
Authoring or Creator Agency: |
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
|
Concerning: |
"2703(d) Orders Under Seal in EDVA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title: |
Case Assignment History Report US District Court Eastern District of Virginia Report Date 4/11/13 |
|
Author: |
Thomas Rawles Jones |
|
Title: |
United States Magistrate Judge |
|
Authoring or Creator Agency: |
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
|
Concerning: |
"2703(d) Orders Under Seal in EDVA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title: |
Case Assignment History Report US District Court Eastern District of Virginia Report Date 4/11/13 |
|
Author: |
Thomas Rawles Jones |
|
Title: |
United States Magistrate Judge |
|
Authoring or Creator Agency: |
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
|
Concerning: |
"2703(d) Orders Under Seal in EDVA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title: |
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Docket#:11-5151 |
|
Concerning: |
"Twitter 2703(d), 2703(d) Orders, Grand Jury |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title: |
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Docket#:11-5151 |
|
Concerning: |
"Twitter 2703(d), 2703(d) Orders, Grand Jury |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title: |
Redacted BRIEF by Appellants Jacob Appelbaum, Rop Gonggrijp and Birgitta Jonsdottir in electronic and paper format. Type of Brief: Opening. Method of Filing Paper Copies: courier. Date Paper Copies Mailed, Dispatched, or Delivered to Court: 01/23/2011. [998770017] [11-5151] Aden Fine |
|
Concerning: |
"Twitter 2703(d), 2703(d) Orders, Grand Jury |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title: |
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Docket#:11-5151 |
|
Concerning: |
"Twitter 2703(d), 2703(d) Orders, Grand Jury |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title: |
NOTICE OF PAPER FILING by Appellants Jacob Appelbaum, Rop Gonggrijp and Birgitta Jonsdottir. Type of paper document filed: appendix Description: Joint Appendix (Vol. 1 of 2) and Sealed Joint Appendix (Vol. 2 of 2) Date paper copies mailed, dispatched or delivered to court: 01/20/2011 Method of filing paper copies: hand delivery [11-5151] Aden Fine |
|
Concerning: |
"Twitter 2703(d), 2703(d) Orders, Grand Jury |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title: |
CERTIFICATE OF CONFIDENTIALITY (Local Rule 25(c)) by Jacob Appelbaum, Rop Gonggrijp and Birgitta Jonsdottir. Sealing Required: Yes. Description of document referenced by certificate: Sealed Joint Appendix. [11-5151] Aden Fine |
|
Concerning: |
"Twitter 2703(d), 2703(d) Orders, Grand Jury |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title: |
CERTIFICATE OF CONFIDENTIALITY (Local Rule 25(c)) by Jacob Appelbaum, Rop Gonggrijp and Birgitta Jonsdottir. Sealing Required: Yes. Description of document referenced by certificate: Appellants' Sealed Brief. [11-5151] Aden Fine |
|
Concerning: |
"Twitter 2703(d), 2703(d) Orders, Grand Jury |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title: |
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Docket#:11-5151 |
|
Concerning: |
"Twitter 2703(d), 2703(d) Orders, Grand Jury |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Author: |
David Coombs |
|
Title: |
civilian defense counsel |
|
Concerning: |
"United States v. Pfc. Bradley Manning |
|
|
|
Archive Link |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title: |
Case Assignment History Report US District Court Eastern District of Virginia Report Date 4/11/13 |
|
Author: |
John Anderson |
|
Title: |
United States Magistrate Judge |
|
Authoring or Creator Agency: |
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
|
Concerning: |
"2703(d) Orders Under Seal in EDVA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MS. JENSEN: Our next question comes IDG News Service, Raffaella Menichini: Can you comment on the recent decision by the Virginia District Court that allows the Justice Department to access records of the Twitter accounts used by WikiLeaks associates? Isn't that a form of violation of privacy on social media, something that the State Department maintains as a basic value?
MR. ROSS: Yeah. No. There's ' absolutely not. In the United States, we have rules for what we call lawful intercept. If there is reason to believe that somebody is committing a crime, for the last decades there is a legal process, a transparent legal process, through which the Justice Department can get, for example, phone records. The news that's been made where the Justice Department can do the same thing, for example, with Twitter records is no different than that which happens hundreds and hundreds and hundreds of time a year and has been happening for decades with the phone.
So the only difference is that we're talking about digital communications versus traditional telephone, but the transparent rule of law and the due process in the United States is the same. So what applies to the telephone applies to social media. And so if you are planning a crime or conducting a crime using the phone, it's not okay, and if you are planning a crime and conducting a crime using social media, similarly it's not okay.
The difference in the United States versus other places is that we do this without sacrificing universal rights. So people have freedom of expression. They have the ability to exercise peaceful, political dissent. They have the ability to communicate however they see fit. What these laws for what we call lawful intercept apply to specifically is investigations regarding the conduct of a crime.
MS. JENSEN: I just want to make a quick correction. The last question came from the Repubblica. |
|
Name(s:) |
Alec Ross |
|
Title: |
Senior Advisor for Innovation |
|
Agency(ies): |
Department of State |
|
Concerning: |
Twitter 2703(d), 2703(d) Orders, Grand Jury |
|
Url: |
Url Link
|
|
Archive: |
Archive Link
http://archive.is/TVvKq |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title: |
Case Assignment History Report US District Court Eastern District of Virginia Report Date 4/11/13 |
|
Author: |
John Anderson |
|
Title: |
United States Magistrate Judge |
|
Authoring or Creator Agency: |
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
|
Concerning: |
"2703(d) Orders Under Seal in EDVA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title: |
Case Assignment History Report US District Court Eastern District of Virginia Report Date 4/11/13 |
|
Author: |
John Anderson |
|
Title: |
United States Magistrate Judge |
|
Authoring or Creator Agency: |
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
|
Concerning: |
"2703(d) Orders Under Seal in EDVA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First, the Justice Department yesterday charged a former CIA agent, John Kiriakou, with four felony counts for having allegedly disclosed classified information to reporters about the CIA's interrogation program. Included among those charges are two counts under the Espionage Act of 1917, based on the allegation that he disclosed information which he 'had reason to believe could be used to the injury of the United States and to the advantage of any foreign nation.' Kiriakou made news in 2007 when he told ABC News that he led the team that captured accused Terrorist Abu Zubaydah and that the techniques to which Zubaydah was subjected, including waterboarding, clearly constituted 'torture,' though he claimed they were effective and arguably justifiable. He's also accused of being the source for a 2008 New York Times article that disclosed the name of one of Zubaydah's CIA interrogators. |
|
Name(s:) |
Glenn Greenwald |
|
Title: |
Journalist |
|
Agency(ies): |
Salon |
|
Concerning: |
Kiriakou |
|
Url: |
Url Link
|
|
Title: |
Former CIA Officer John Kiriakou Charged with Disclosing Covert Officer's Identity and Other Classified Information to Journalists and Lying to CIA's Publications Review Board |
|
Authoring or Creator Agency: |
Office of Public Affairs, Department of Justice |
|
|
|
Archive Link |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title: |
WikiLeaks Publication New Assange TV Series |
|
Concerning: |
"WikiLeaks Publication |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title: |
Case Assignment History Report US District Court Eastern District of Virginia Report Date 4/11/13 |
|
Author: |
John Anderson |
|
Title: |
United States Magistrate Judge |
|
Authoring or Creator Agency: |
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
|
Concerning: |
"2703(d) Orders Under Seal in EDVA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title: |
Case Assignment History Report US District Court Eastern District of Virginia Report Date 4/11/13 |
|
Author: |
John Anderson |
|
Title: |
United States Magistrate Judge |
|
Authoring or Creator Agency: |
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
|
Concerning: |
"2703(d) Orders Under Seal in EDVA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title: |
Case Assignment History Report US District Court Eastern District of Virginia Report Date 4/11/13 |
|
Author: |
John Anderson |
|
Title: |
United States Magistrate Judge |
|
Authoring or Creator Agency: |
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
|
Concerning: |
"2703(d) Orders Under Seal in EDVA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title: |
Case Assignment History Report US District Court Eastern District of Virginia Report Date 4/11/13 |
|
Author: |
John Anderson |
|
Title: |
United States Magistrate Judge |
|
Authoring or Creator Agency: |
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
|
Concerning: |
"2703(d) Orders Under Seal in EDVA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title: |
Case Assignment History Report US District Court Eastern District of Virginia Report Date 4/11/13 |
|
Author: |
John Anderson |
|
Title: |
United States Magistrate Judge |
|
Authoring or Creator Agency: |
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
|
Concerning: |
"2703(d) Orders Under Seal in EDVA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The lawsuit hallenges the failure of the DOJ Criminal Division, the DOJ National Security Division, and the FBI to disclose documents in response to EPIC's June 23, 2011 FOIA Requests seeking agency records concerning the government's identification and surveillance of individuals who have demonstrated support or interest in WikiLeaks. |
|
Agency(ies): |
Electronic Privacy Information Center, EPIC |
|
Concerning: |
Epic FOIA, Criminal Division, National Security Division, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Department of Justice, FBI, NSD |
|
Url: |
Url Link
|
|
Title: |
COMPLAINT against FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, CRIMINAL DIVISION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, NATIONAL SECURITY DIVISION ( Filing fee $ 350, receipt number 4616045510) filed by ELECTRONIC PRIVACY INFORMATION CENTER. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(jf, ) (Entered: 01/26/2012) |
|
Author: |
Ginger McCall, John Verdi, Marc Rotenbergy, David Jacobs |
|
Authoring or Creator Agency: |
Electronic Privacy Information Center, EPIC |
|
Concerning: |
"Epic FOIA, Criminal Division, National Security Division, Federal Bureau of Investigation, FBI, Department of Justice |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title: |
LCvR 7.1 CERTIFICATE OF DISCLOSURE of Corporate Affiliations and Financial Interests NONE by ELECTRONIC PRIVACY INFORMATION CENTER (jf, ) (Entered: 01/26/2012) |
|
Author: |
Ginger McCall, John Verdi, Marc Rotenbergy, David Jacobs |
|
Authoring or Creator Agency: |
Electronic Privacy Information Center, EPIC |
|
Concerning: |
"Epic FOIA, Criminal Division, National Security Division, Federal Bureau of Investigation, FBI, Department of Justice |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title: |
Docket for ELECTRONIC PRIVACY INFORMATION CENTER v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, CRIMINAL DIVISION et al, U.S. District Court District of Columbia (Washington, DC) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:12-cv-00127-RWR |
|
Concerning: |
"Epic FOIA, Criminal Division, National Security Division, Federal Bureau of Investigation, FBI, Department of Justice |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title: |
Intelligence, Information Sharing, and Security Jan 26, 2012 |
|
Authoring or Creator Agency: |
C-SPAN |
|
Notes: |
2 commnets at ~23:15 and 45:00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title: |
Case Assignment History Report US District Court Eastern District of Virginia Report Date 4/11/13 |
|
Author: |
John Anderson |
|
Title: |
United States Magistrate Judge |
|
Authoring or Creator Agency: |
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
|
Concerning: |
"2703(d) Orders Under Seal in EDVA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title: |
Case Assignment History Report US District Court Eastern District of Virginia Report Date 4/11/13 |
|
Author: |
Theresa Buchanan, Thomas Rawles Jones |
|
Title: |
United States Magistrate Judge |
|
Authoring or Creator Agency: |
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
|
Concerning: |
"2703(d) Orders Under Seal in EDVA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title: |
Case Assignment History Report US District Court Eastern District of Virginia Report Date 4/11/13 |
|
Author: |
Theresa Buchanan, Thomas Rawles Jones |
|
Title: |
United States Magistrate Judge |
|
Authoring or Creator Agency: |
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
|
Concerning: |
"2703(d) Orders Under Seal in EDVA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title: |
Case Assignment History Report US District Court Eastern District of Virginia Report Date 4/11/13 |
|
Author: |
Theresa Buchanan, Thomas Rawles Jones |
|
Title: |
United States Magistrate Judge |
|
Authoring or Creator Agency: |
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
|
Concerning: |
"2703(d) Orders Under Seal in EDVA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title: |
Case Assignment History Report US District Court Eastern District of Virginia Report Date 4/11/13 |
|
Author: |
Theresa Buchanan, Thomas Rawles Jones |
|
Title: |
United States Magistrate Judge |
|
Authoring or Creator Agency: |
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
|
Concerning: |
"2703(d) Orders Under Seal in EDVA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title: |
Case Assignment History Report US District Court Eastern District of Virginia Report Date 4/11/13 |
|
Author: |
Theresa Buchanan, Thomas Rawles Jones |
|
Title: |
United States Magistrate Judge |
|
Authoring or Creator Agency: |
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
|
Concerning: |
"2703(d) Orders Under Seal in EDVA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title: |
Case Assignment History Report US District Court Eastern District of Virginia Report Date 4/11/13 |
|
Author: |
Theresa Buchanan, Thomas Rawles Jones |
|
Title: |
United States Magistrate Judge |
|
Authoring or Creator Agency: |
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
|
Concerning: |
"2703(d) Orders Under Seal in EDVA |
|
|