United States vs. Manning

2013-03-07

Claes Borgstr_m letter to the Stockholm District Court

		As I explained in my letter 2013-03-07 to the district court, its been impossible to avoid contact with the media. But it should be emphasised that its been of vital importance for the complainant that the plaintiff counsel has repeatedly contributed to debunking false rumours which, amongst other things, have intimated that the complaint filed was disingenuous, that the complainant laid out a honey trap for Assange, that the purpose was to harm the WikiLeaks organisation, that she worked with the CIA, and so forth.
	Name(s:)	Claes Borgstrom
	Concerning:	Sweden versus Assange
	Url:	Url Link
	Archive:	http://archive.is/QAwuy