|
|
|
|
|
The government simply states that NSD personnel 'determined which component(s) within NSD would be likely to possess responsive recrods,' and that any documents not in the lead attorney's electroni files would be 'duplicative.' Bradley Decl., Ex. 3, at [Paragraph] 9. The declaration does not explain how NSD determined which component to search, why it believes that other documents would b duplicative, or the terms used, if any, to search the elctronic files. |
| |
Name(s:) |
Marc Rotenberg, Ginger McCall, David Jacobs |
| |
Agency(ies): |
Electronic Privacy Information Center, EPIC |
|
Url: |
Url Link
|
|
Title: |
Memorandum in opposition to re 12 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by ELECTRONIC PRIVACY INFORMATION CENTER. (Attachments: # 1 Statement of Facts, # 2 Text of Proposed Order)(McCall, Ginger) (Entered: 03/04/2013) |
|
Concerning: |
"Epic FOIA, Criminal Division, National Security Division, Federal Bureau of Investigation, FBI, Department of Justice |
|
|
