United States vs. Manning

A timeline of the U.S. investigation between 2006 to 2013

  • submit to reddit
 
2010-04-10
 
Archive Link
XXXXXXXXXX He is a psychiatrist that performed a behavioral health evaluation on PFC Manning on 22 May and 28 May 2010. He will testify that XXXXXXXXXX [ Master Sergeant Paul Adkins (now Sergeant First Class due to an administrative action) ] had expressed concern to him about PFC Manning around l0 April 2010, and had given him a memorandum where he documented his concerns. Since PFC Manning's primary clinician, XXXXXXXXXX was on leave at the time, he completed the command directed mental health evaluation. Based on his interview of PFC Manning and review of his records, XXXXXXXXXX will testify,' that he determined PFC Manning was at risk to himself and others and recommended that he not have an operable weapon. He will testify that he considered making a recommendation as to PFC Manning's access to classified information in his 22 May 2010 evaluation but did not do so because he had been informed that PFC Manning was no longer allowed in the T-SCIF. Instead, he deleted the block referencing access to classified information on the MEDCOM Form 4038 in order to have more space to write notes on the form. XXXXXXXXXX will testify that he did receive training on the subject of Soldier suitability for access to classified information. The training that he received was informal 'on-the-job' training during his residency. He will testify that the factors suggested to look for in making suitability determinations were (1) reliability, (2) suitability, and (3) judgment. On his 28 May 2010 mental health evaluation. XXXXXXXXXX will testify that he made a recommendation that PFC Manning was not suitable for continued access to classified material and that his security clearance should be rescinded.
  Name(s:) David Coombs
  Title: civilian defense counsel
Url: Url Link
Archive: http://archive.is/bb9SO
 
database built by Alexa O'Brien and Shoofly Solutions