United States vs. Manning

2009-12-30

2010-05-26

		XXXXXXXXXX [ WHO IS THIS? ] He will testify that he treated PFC Manning on numerous between 30 December 2009 and 26 May 2010. As part of his treatment XXXXXXXXXX [ WHO IS THIS? ] considered letters written by PFC Manning's noncommissioned officer in charge [ Master Sergeant Paul Adkins (now Sergeant First Class due to an administrative action) ], then XXXXXXXXXX [ WHAT IS THIS? ]. He will testify that now XXXXXXXXXX [ Master Sergeant Paul Adkins (now Sergeant First Class due to an administrative action) ] expressed concern about PFC Manning's mental and emotional stability in the three letters noting that PFC Manning appeared to be suffering greatly and also having difficulty sharing his problem. XXXXXXXXXX [ WHO IS THIS? ] will testify that he contacted XXXXXXXXXX [ WHO IS THIS? ] after each evaluation was completed in order to give him a summary of the information from his review and to allow XXXXXXXXXX [WHO IS THIS?] to share his thoughts and concerns. Despite the behavior of PFC Manning, XXXXXXXXXX [ WHO IS THIS? ] will admit that he never made a recommendation to the command concerning whether to suspend PFC Manning's security clearance. He did, however, speak with XXXXXXXXXX [ WHO IS THIS? ] and XXXXXXXXXX [ WHO IS THIS? ]about his reviews and PFC Manning's need for ongoing long term psychotherapy to explore and understand his issues.
	Name(s:)	David Coombs
	Title:	civilian defense counsel
	Url:	Url Link
	Archive:	http://archive.is/K3k5V