|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title: |
Transcript | US v Pfc. Manning, Article 39(a) Session, 03/16/12 |
|
Author: |
Alexa O'Brien |
|
Title: |
Journalist |
|
Concerning: |
"United States v. Pfc. Bradley Manning |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr Assange's barrister Dinah Rose QC told the court that the prosecutor was not a 'judicial authority', as required by British law, and therefore the warrant for Mr Assange is invalid.
However Clare Montgomery QC representing Swedish authorities said the warrant is valid and that others issued by prosecutors across Europe have resulted in the extradition of individuals. |
| |
Agency(ies): |
AAP |
|
Concerning: |
Sweden versus Assange |
|
Url: |
Url Link
|
|
Archive: |
Archive Link
http://archive.is/RcX7e |
|
Title: |
Assange UK Supreme Court Appeal Hearing February 1, 2012 |
|
Authoring or Creator Agency: |
MrCode2222 |
|
Concerning: |
"Sweden versus Assange |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title: |
Julian Assange's UK Supreme Court Submission |
|
Author: |
Dinah Rose QC, Mark Summers, Helen Law |
|
Authoring or Creator Agency: |
Blackstone Chambers, Matrix Chambers |
|
Concerning: |
"Sweden versus Assange |
|
|
Title: |
Assange UK Supreme Court Appeal Hearing February 2, 2012 |
|
Authoring or Creator Agency: |
TheDigitalfolklore |
|
Concerning: |
"Sweden versus Assange |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title: |
WikiLeaks Publication WikiLeaks denounces UNESCO after WikiLeaks banned from UNESCO conference on WikiLeaks |
|
Concerning: |
"WikiLeaks Publication |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title: |
Case Assignment History Report US District Court Eastern District of Virginia Report Date 4/11/13 |
|
Author: |
Theresa Buchanan, Thomas Rawles Jones |
|
Title: |
United States Magistrate Judge |
|
Authoring or Creator Agency: |
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
|
Concerning: |
"2703(d) Orders Under Seal in EDVA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title: |
Case Assignment History Report US District Court Eastern District of Virginia Report Date 4/11/13 |
|
Author: |
Theresa Buchanan, Thomas Rawles Jones |
|
Title: |
United States Magistrate Judge |
|
Authoring or Creator Agency: |
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
|
Concerning: |
"2703(d) Orders Under Seal in EDVA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title: |
Case Assignment History Report US District Court Eastern District of Virginia Report Date 4/11/13 |
|
Author: |
Theresa Buchanan, Thomas Rawles Jones |
|
Title: |
United States Magistrate Judge |
|
Authoring or Creator Agency: |
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
|
Concerning: |
"2703(d) Orders Under Seal in EDVA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The commander of the Military District of Washington has ordered a court-martial for Pfc. Bradley E. Manning [...] Maj. Gen. Michael S. Linnington made the decision [_] There was no word on whether the as-yet-unscheduled court-martial would also be held at Fort Meade, one of three installations within the military district equipped to host such a proceeding...The U.S. Army Trial Judiciary will now assign a military judge, who will set a date for Manning's arraignment, motion hearings and trial. |
| |
Name(s:) |
Matthew Hay Brow |
| |
Title: |
Reporter |
| |
Agency(ies): |
Baltimore Sun |
|
Concerning: |
United States v. Pfc. Bradley Manning |
|
Url: |
Url Link
|
|
Archive: |
Archive Link
http://archive.is/zKGwH |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
While supporting the #BradleyManning prosecution, it's hard to credibly argue as we exit #Iraq and #Afghanistan that he 'aided the enemy.' |
| |
Name(s:) |
Phillip J. Crowley |
| |
Title: |
Assistant Secretary |
| |
Agency(ies): |
Public Affairs, Department of State |
|
Concerning: |
United States v. Pfc. Bradley Manning |
|
Url: |
Url Link
|
|
Archive: |
Archive Link
http://archive.is/NB0J4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title: |
Case Assignment History Report US District Court Eastern District of Virginia Report Date 4/11/13 |
|
Author: |
Ivan Davis |
|
Title: |
United States Magistrate Judge |
|
Authoring or Creator Agency: |
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
|
Concerning: |
"2703(d) Orders Under Seal in EDVA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title: |
Case Assignment History Report US District Court Eastern District of Virginia Report Date 4/11/13 |
|
Author: |
Ivan Davis |
|
Title: |
United States Magistrate Judge |
|
Authoring or Creator Agency: |
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
|
Concerning: |
"2703(d) Orders Under Seal in EDVA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title: |
Case Assignment History Report US District Court Eastern District of Virginia Report Date 4/11/13 |
|
Author: |
Ivan Davis |
|
Title: |
United States Magistrate Judge |
|
Authoring or Creator Agency: |
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
|
Concerning: |
"2703(d) Orders Under Seal in EDVA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title: |
MOTION by Appellee US to extend filing time for response/reply brief until Response: February 28, 2012 Reply: March 20, 2012. Date and method of service: 02/09/2012 ecf [998785378] [11-5151] Lindsay Kelly |
|
Concerning: |
"Twitter 2703(d), 2703(d) Orders, Grand Jury |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title: |
Case Assignment History Report US District Court Eastern District of Virginia Report Date 4/11/13 |
|
Author: |
Ivan Davis |
|
Title: |
United States Magistrate Judge |
|
Authoring or Creator Agency: |
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
|
Concerning: |
"2703(d) Orders Under Seal in EDVA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title: |
Case Assignment History Report US District Court Eastern District of Virginia Report Date 4/11/13 |
|
Author: |
Ivan Davis |
|
Title: |
United States Magistrate Judge |
|
Authoring or Creator Agency: |
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
|
Concerning: |
"2703(d) Orders Under Seal in EDVA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title: |
Docket correction requested from Mr. John DeWitt Cline for Rop Gonggrijp. Re: [<A HREF='_SERVLETURL_/docs1/00403680730' target='new' ONCLICK="return doDocPostURL('00403680730','115969');" >12</A>] appearance of counsel. Access to appearance of counsel has been restricted to case participants.. Mailed to: John DeWitt Cline. [11-5151] (MR) |
|
Concerning: |
"Twitter 2703(d), 2703(d) Orders, Grand Jury |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title: |
ORDER filed [998785841] granting Motion to extend filing time [<A HREF='_SERVLETURL_/docs1/00403753509' target='new' ONCLICK="return doDocPostURL('00403753509','115969');" >24</A>], updating/ resuming briefing order deadlines. Response brief due 02/28/2012 Copies to all parties... [11-5151] (MR) |
|
Concerning: |
"Twitter 2703(d), 2703(d) Orders, Grand Jury |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title: |
Case Assignment History Report US District Court Eastern District of Virginia Report Date 4/11/13 |
|
Author: |
Ivan Davis |
|
Title: |
United States Magistrate Judge |
|
Authoring or Creator Agency: |
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
|
Concerning: |
"2703(d) Orders Under Seal in EDVA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title: |
Case Assignment History Report US District Court Eastern District of Virginia Report Date 4/11/13 |
|
Author: |
Ivan Davis |
|
Title: |
United States Magistrate Judge |
|
Authoring or Creator Agency: |
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
|
Concerning: |
"2703(d) Orders Under Seal in EDVA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
National Security
Defending national security from both internal and external threats remains the Department of Justice's highest priority. The FY 2013 Budget request provides a total of $4 billion to maintain critical counterterrorism and counterintelligence programs and sustain recent increases for intelligence gathering and surveillance capabilities.
The administration supports critical national security programs within the department, including those led by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and the National Security Division (NSD). In FY 2011, the FBI dedicated approximately 4,200 agents to investigate more than 33,000 national security cases. NSD has continued to carry out its primary functions to prevent acts of terrorism and espionage in the United States and to facilitate the collection of information regarding the activities of foreign agents and powers.
Investigating cybercrime and protecting our nation's critical network infrastructure is a top priority of the department. The President's FY 2013 Budget request maintains recent increases for the FBI's cyber terrorism investigations, the National Cyber Investigative Joint Task Force (NCIJTF) and the forensic examination of digital evidence. In addition, other department components have made critical investments to protect U.S. citizens and secure our homeland, and these components will continue their efforts in FY 2013. |
| |
Agency(ies): |
Office of Public Affairs, Department of Justice |
|
Url: |
Url Link
|
|
Archive: |
Archive Link
http://archive.is/wjYqg |
|
|
a. Insider Threat
The 2010 WikiLeaks incident and other recent data leakage occurrences highlight the fact that insider threats pose one of the greatest risks to government information systems. Employees are trusted with sensitive and/or classified information and there is often little oversight or security governing that access. Implementing strong, flexible, and scalable measures to prevent insider attacks from succeeding is vital. The recent agency-wide Information Security Assessment revealed significant security weaknesses throughout the government and within the Department. Of primary concern are the control and monitoring of removable media, insider threat behavior monitoring and detection, and prevention of data leaks on all sensitive and classified information systems.
To counter insider threats, the increase will be used to design a defense plan and acquire and implement hardware infrastructure and software tools to monitor, detect, and respond to insider threats. |
| |
Agency(ies): |
Department of Justice |
|
Url: |
Url Link
|
|
Title: |
U.S. Department of Justice FY 2013 Budget Request NATIONAL SECURITY $4.0 billion DOJ National Security Programs FY 2013 Overview |
|
Authoring or Creator Agency: |
Department of Justice |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title: |
Case Assignment History Report US District Court Eastern District of Virginia Report Date 4/11/13 |
|
Author: |
Thomas Rawles Jones |
|
Title: |
United States Magistrate Judge |
|
Authoring or Creator Agency: |
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
|
Concerning: |
"2703(d) Orders Under Seal in EDVA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title: |
Case Assignment History Report US District Court Eastern District of Virginia Report Date 4/11/13 |
|
Author: |
Thomas Rawles Jones |
|
Title: |
United States Magistrate Judge |
|
Authoring or Creator Agency: |
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
|
Concerning: |
"2703(d) Orders Under Seal in EDVA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title: |
Case Assignment History Report US District Court Eastern District of Virginia Report Date 4/11/13 |
|
Author: |
Thomas Rawles Jones |
|
Title: |
United States Magistrate Judge |
|
Authoring or Creator Agency: |
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
|
Concerning: |
"2703(d) Orders Under Seal in EDVA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Author: |
David Coombs |
|
Title: |
civilian defense counsel |
|
Concerning: |
"United States v. Pfc. Bradley Manning |
|
|
|
Archive Link |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a.) XXXXXXXXXX [ JAMES CULKY (sp.), 4TH CALVARY DIVISION, BRIGADE S2 ] He will testify about his classification review of the three Apache gun videos that were sent to his Division by FORSCOM. Specifically, he will testify that the videos were not classified at the time of their alleged release. However, he will testify that he believes that videos should have been classified. He will also testify regarding his classification determination. The requested deposition is needed due to the Article 32 Investigating Officer's [ Lt. Col. Paul Almanza ] improper determination that XXXXXXXXXX [ JAMES CULKY (sp.), 4TH CALVARY DIVISION, BRIGADE S2 ] was not reasonably available at the Article 32 hearing. XXXXXXXXXX [ JAMES CULKY (sp.), 4TH CALVARY DIVISION, BRIGADE S2 ] was an essential witness and should have been produced in person at the Article 32 hearing. Additionally, given the fact XXXXXXXXXX [ JAMES CULKY (sp.), 4TH CALVARY DIVISION, BRIGADE S2 ] believes the matter that the Defense wishes to discuss with him is classified, the government needs to arrange for a proper location for the deposition. The Defense requests that an oral deposition be conducted.
b.) XXXXXXXXXX[ REAR ADMIRAL KEVIN DONEGAN, DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS, USCENTCOM ]. XXXXXXXXXX[ REAR ADMIRAL KEVIN DONEGAN, DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS, USCENTCOM ] conducted classification reviews on two PowerPoint slide presentations of official reports originated by USCENTCOM. XXXXXXXXXX [ REAR ADMIRAL KEVIN DONEGAN, DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS, USCENTCOM ] will testify regarding his classification determination and his belief of the impact on national security due to the release of the information. The requested deposition is needed due to the Article 32 Investigating Officer's [ Lt. Col. Paul Almanza ] improper determination that XXXXXXXXXX [ REAR ADMIRAL KEVIN DONEGAN, DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS, USCENTCOM ] was not reasonably available at the Article 32 hearing. XXXXXXXXXX [ REAR ADMIRAL KEVIN DONEGAN, DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS, USCENTCOM ] was essential witness and should have been produced in person at the Article 32 hearing. Additionally, given the classified nature of his testimony, the government needs to arrange for a proper location for the deposition. The Defense requests that an oral deposition be conducted.
c.) XXXXXXXXXX [ MR. BETTS, CHIEF CLASSIFICATION OFFICER, US CYBER COMMAND ], the government has not provided the defense with the contact information for XXXXXXXXXX [ MR. BETTS, CHIEF CLASSIFICATION OFFICER, US CYBER COMMAND ]. XXXXXXXXXX [ MR. BETTS, CHIEF CLASSIFICATION OFFICER, US CYBER COMMAND ] will testify about his classification determination concerning the alleged chat logs between XXXXXXXXXX [ ADRIAN LAMO ] and Bradley Manning. Specifically, he will testify about his classification assessment of information discussed in the alleged chat logs. The requested deposition is needed due to the Article 32 Investigating Officer's [ Lt. Col. Paul Almanza ] improper determination that XXXXXXXXXX [ MR. BETTS, CHIEF CLASSIFICATION OFFICER, US CYBER COMMAND ] was not reasonably available at the Article 32 hearing. XXXXXXXXXX [ MR. BETTS, CHIEF CLASSIFICATION OFFICER, US CYBER COMMAND ] was an essential witness and should have been produced in person at the Article 32 hearing. Additionally, given the classified nature of his testimony, the government needs to arrange for a proper location for the deposition. The Defense requests that an oral deposition be conducted.
d.) XXXXXXXXXX [ ROBERT E. SCHMIDLE, DEPUTY COMMANDER, US CYBERCOM ]. XXXXXXXXXX [ ROBERT E. SCHMIDLE, DEPUTY COMMANDER, US CYBERCOM ] is the Original Classification Authority (OCA) over the information discussed by XXXXXXXXXX [ MR. BETTS, CHIEF CLASSIFICATION OFFICER, US CYBER COMMAND ]. XXXXXXXXXX [ ROBERT E. SCHMIDLE, DEPUTY COMMANDER, US CYBERCOM ] will testify that he concurs with the classification determination and impact statements made XXXXXXXXXX [ MR. BETTS, US CYBER COMMAND ]. The Defense would like to question him regarding his declaration and the basis of his belief. The requested deposition is needed due to the Article 32 Investigating Officer's [ Lt. Col. Paul Almanza ] improper determination that XXXXXXXXXX [ ROBERT E. SCHMIDLE, DEPUTY COMMANDER, US CYBERCOM ] was not reasonably available at the Article 32 hearing. XXXXXXXXXX [ ROBERT E. SCHMIDLE, DEPUTY COMMANDER, US CYBERCOM ] was an essential witness and should have been produced in person at the Article 32 hearing. Additionally, given the classified nature of his testimony, the government needs to arrange for a proper location for the deposition. The Defense requests that an oral deposition be conducted.
e.) XXXXXXXXXX [ VICE ADMIRAL ROBERT S. HARWARD, DEPUTY COMMANDER, US CENTRAL COMMANDER, US CENTRAL COMMAND (USCENTCOM) ]. XXXXXXXXXX [ VICE ADMIRAL ROBERT S. HARWARD, DEPUTY COMMANDER, US CENTRAL COMMANDER, US CENTRAL COMMAND (USCENTCOM) ] will testify concerning his classification review and classification determination concerning the CIDNE Afghanistan Events, CIDNE Iraq Events, other briefings and the BE22PAX.wmv video [Garani Air Strike Video]. Specifically, XXXXXXXXXX [ VICE ADMIRAL ROBERT S. HARWARD, DEPUTY COMMANDER, US CENTRAL COMMANDER, US CENTRAL COMMAND (USCENTCOM) ] will testify concerning his classification determination and his belief of the impact on national security from having this information released to the public. The requested deposition is needed due to the Article 32 Investigating Officer's [Lt. Col. Paul Almanza] improper determination XXXXXXXXXX [ VICE ADMIRAL ROBERT S. HARWARD, DEPUTY COMMANDER, US CENTRAL COMMANDER, US CENTRAL COMMAND (USCENTCOM) ] was not reasonably available at the Article 32 hearing. XXXXXXXXXX [ VICE ADMIRAL ROBERT S. HARWARD, DEPUTY COMMANDER, US CENTRAL COMMANDER, US CENTRAL COMMAND (USCENTCOM) ] was an essential witness and should have been produced in person at the Article 32 hearing. Additionally, given the classified nature of his testimony, the government needs to arrange for a proper location for the deposition. The Defense requests that an oral deposition be conducted.
f.) XXXXXXXXXX [ PATRICK F. KENNEDY, UNDER SECRETARY, MANAGEMENT, DEPARTMENT OF STATE ]. The government has not provided the contact information for XXXXXXXXXX [ PATRICK F. KENNEDY, UNDER SECRETARY, MANAGEMENT, DEPARTMENT OF STATE ]. XXXXXXXXXX [ PATRICK F. KENNEDY, UNDER SECRETARY, MANAGEMENT, DEPARTMENT OF STATE ] will testify concerning his review of the disclosure of Department of State Diplomatic Cables stored within the Net-Centric will testify concerning his Diplomacy server and part of SIPDIS. XXXXXXXXXX [ PATRICK F. KENNEDY, UNDER SECRETARY, MANAGEMENT, DEPARTMENT OF STATE ] will testify concerning his classification determination and the impact of the release of the information on national security. The requested deposition is needed due to the Article 32 Investigating Officer's [ Lt. Col. Paul Almanza ] improper determination that XXXXXXXXXX [ PATRICK F. KENNEDY, UNDER SECRETARY, MANAGEMENT, DEPARTMENT OF STATE ] was not reasonably available for the Article 32 hearing. XXXXXXXXXX [ PATRICK F. KENNEDY, UNDER SECRETARY, MANAGEMENT, DEPARTMENT OF STATE ] was an essential witness and should have been produced in person hearing. Additionally, given the classified nature of his testimony, the government needs to arrange for a proper location for the deposition. The Defense requests that an oral deposition be conducted.
g.) XXXXXXXXXX [ REAR ADMIRAL DAVID B. WOODS, COMMANDER, JOINT TASK FORCE GUANTANAMO ]. XXXXXXXXXX [ REAR ADMIRAL DAVID B. WOODS, COMMANDER, JOINT TASK FORCE GUANTANAMO ] will testify review of the disclosure of five documents, totaling twenty-two pages. XXXXXXXXXX [ REAR ADMIRAL DAVID B. WOODS, COMMANDER, JOINT TASK FORCE GUANTANAMO ] will testify concerning his classification determination and his belief regarding the impact of the release of information on national security. The requested deposition is needed due to the Article 32 Investigating Officer's [ Lt. Col. Paul Almanza ] improper determination that XXXXXXXXXX [ REAR ADMIRAL DAVID B. WOODS, COMMANDER, JOINT TASK FORCE GUANTANAMO ] was not reasonably available. XXXXXXXXXX [ REAR ADM |
| |
Name(s:) |
Alexa O'Brien |
| |
Title: |
Journalist |
|
Concerning: |
United States v. Pfc. Bradley Manning |
|
Url: |
Url Link
|
|
Archive: |
Archive Link
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/701543-20120216-defense-motion-to-compel-depositions-un.html |
|
Author: |
David Coombs |
|
Title: |
civilian defense counsel |
|
Concerning: |
"United States v. Pfc. Bradley Manning |
|
|
|
Archive Link |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Author: |
David Coombs |
|
Title: |
civilian defense counsel |
|
Concerning: |
"United States v. Pfc. Bradley Manning |
|
|
|
Archive Link |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title: |
Case Assignment History Report US District Court Eastern District of Virginia Report Date 4/11/13 |
|
Author: |
Thomas Rawles Jones |
|
Title: |
United States Magistrate Judge |
|
Authoring or Creator Agency: |
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
|
Concerning: |
"2703(d) Orders Under Seal in EDVA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title: |
MOTION by Appellants Jacob Appelbaum, Rop Gonggrijp and Birgitta Jonsdottir to extend filing time for reply brief until March 20, 2012. Date and method of service: 02/17/2012 ecf [998791271] [11-5151] Aden Fine |
|
Concerning: |
"Twitter 2703(d), 2703(d) Orders, Grand Jury |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title: |
ORDER filed [998791452] granting Motion to extend filing time [<A HREF='_SERVLETURL_/docs1/00403766566' target='new' ONCLICK="return doDocPostURL('00403766566','115969');" >27</A>], updating reply brief deadlines Reply brief due 03/20/2012. Copies to all parties. [11-5151] (ALC) |
|
Concerning: |
"Twitter 2703(d), 2703(d) Orders, Grand Jury |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title: |
WikiLeaks Publication Press Release - 500 Days of the WikiLeaks Banking Blockade |
|
Concerning: |
"WikiLeaks Publication |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title: |
Case Assignment History Report US District Court Eastern District of Virginia Report Date 4/11/13 |
|
Author: |
Thomas Rawles Jones |
|
Title: |
United States Magistrate Judge |
|
Authoring or Creator Agency: |
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
|
Concerning: |
"2703(d) Orders Under Seal in EDVA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title: |
Case Assignment History Report US District Court Eastern District of Virginia Report Date 4/11/13 |
|
Author: |
John Anderson |
|
Title: |
United States Magistrate Judge |
|
Authoring or Creator Agency: |
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
|
Concerning: |
"2703(d) Orders Under Seal in EDVA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title: |
Case Assignment History Report US District Court Eastern District of Virginia Report Date 4/11/13 |
|
Author: |
John Anderson |
|
Title: |
United States Magistrate Judge |
|
Authoring or Creator Agency: |
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
|
Concerning: |
"2703(d) Orders Under Seal in EDVA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title: |
Case Assignment History Report US District Court Eastern District of Virginia Report Date 4/11/13 |
|
Author: |
John Anderson |
|
Title: |
United States Magistrate Judge |
|
Authoring or Creator Agency: |
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
|
Concerning: |
"2703(d) Orders Under Seal in EDVA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title: |
Transcript of US v Pfc. Bradley Manning, Article 39(a) Arraignment, 02/23/12 |
|
Author: |
Alexa O'Brien |
|
Title: |
Journalist |
|
Concerning: |
"United States v. Pfc. Bradley Manning |
|
|
|
Archive Link |
|
Title: |
Cameron Leiker Battalion Commander at US Army |
|
Authoring or Creator Agency: |
LinkedIn |
|
Concerning: |
"United States v. Pfc. Bradley Manning |
|
|
|
Archive Link |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title: |
20120223-(AE 10) Seal Order (Defense Ex Parte Filing) Redacted |
|
Author: |
Denise Lind |
|
Title: |
Chief Military Judge |
|
Authoring or Creator Agency: |
First Judicial Circuit, United States Army, Department of Defense |
|
Concerning: |
"United States v. Pfc. Bradley Manning, Court Order or Ruling |
|
|
|
Archive Link |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title: |
20120323-(AE 35) Ruling (Amicus Curiae Filings) Redacted |
|
Author: |
Denise Lind |
|
Title: |
Chief Military Judge |
|
Authoring or Creator Agency: |
First Judicial Circuit, United States Army, Department of Defense |
|
Concerning: |
"United States v. Pfc. Bradley Manning, Court Order or Ruling |
|
|
|
Archive Link |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title: |
Case Assignment History Report US District Court Eastern District of Virginia Report Date 4/11/13 |
|
Author: |
Thomas Rawles Jones |
|
Title: |
United States Magistrate Judge |
|
Authoring or Creator Agency: |
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
|
Concerning: |
"2703(d) Orders Under Seal in EDVA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title: |
MOTION by Appellee US to extend filing time for Response Brief and Reply Brief until Response Brief: March 1, 2012; Reply Brief: March 23, 2012. Date and method of service: 02/24/2012 ecf [998796228] [11-5151] Lindsay Kelly |
|
Concerning: |
"Twitter 2703(d), 2703(d) Orders, Grand Jury |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title: |
ORDER filed [998796099] sealing. Joint Appendix Volume II. Copies to all parties... [11-5151] (MR) |
|
Concerning: |
"Twitter 2703(d), 2703(d) Orders, Grand Jury |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title: |
ORDER filed [998796109] sealing. SEALED opening brief. Copies to all parties... [11-5151] (MR) |
|
Concerning: |
"Twitter 2703(d), 2703(d) Orders, Grand Jury |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title: |
ORDER filed [998796285] granting Motion to extend filing time [<A HREF='_SERVLETURL_/docs1/00403777479' target='new' ONCLICK="return doDocPostURL('00403777479','115969');" >34</A>], updating/ resuming briefing order deadlines. Response brief due 03/01/2012, updating/resuming reply brief deadlines Reply brief due 03/23/2012 Copies to all parties... [11-5151] (MR) |
|
Concerning: |
"Twitter 2703(d), 2703(d) Orders, Grand Jury |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title: |
20120224-(AE 11) Court Pretrial Publicity Order Redacted |
|
Author: |
Denise Lind |
|
Title: |
Chief Military Judge |
|
Authoring or Creator Agency: |
First Judicial Circuit, United States Army, Department of Defense |
|
Concerning: |
"United States v. Pfc. Bradley Manning, Court Order or Ruling |
|
|
|
Archive Link |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Challenge
Safeguarding Classified Material. In response to a November 2010 OMB memorandum that noted the 'significant damage to our national security' caused by WikiLeaks disclosures, USAID conducted: (1) a self-assessment of the Agency's handling of classified material; (2) an external review by the Information Security Oversight Office and the Office of the National Counterintelligence Executive (ONCE); and (3) a review by the OIG. All three of these efforts noted areas for improvement in safeguarding classified material.
Actions Taken
Policy. The recommendations of the ONCE to improve the policy, standards, operating procedures, processes and guidelines for classified operations were embraced by USAID. As a result USAID drafted new management policies for classified operations, communications security, cable room operations, conducting secure meetings and conferences, and personal electronic device management.
Safeguard and Protection.
To assure secure system baselines, USAID re-imaged 131 classified system hard drives to the latest DOS ClassNet operating system baseline, between July and October 2011. Further, all system hard drive antivirus signatures were validated and current. The software was validated to ensure it actively monitors ClassNet systems. USAID performed an internal assessment of current infrastructure against future requirements. This assessment spanned user-classified processing systems, secure video telecommunications, secure voice, and controlled, secure print capability and protected distribution systems at future planned secure operations locations to harden protective capabilities of physical connections. USAID planned, researched, and invested in thin client infrastructure, personal identification number (PIN)-secured networked print devices, TEMPEST-certified secure video teleconference with TEMPEST-certified secure Voice Over Internet Phone (VOIP) for both Secret and Top Secret-Sensitive Compartmented Information environments. USAID also purchased encryption device upgrades with appropriate administrative training packages to reinforce proper administrative capability within the Agency. USAID plans to be fully migrated to a thin client-managed environment by June 2012. In addition, USAID is developing a local model that adopts and mirrors the Defense Information System Agency safeguard and protective measures, to include implementation of minimum required, limited, designated Agency 'trusted agents,' who will be authorized to reproduce classified documentation, and will be accountable for tracking, documenting, transferring to internal and external bureaus and/or agencies, and dispositioning media on behalf of USAID.
Continuity of Operations Program.
USAID has initiated actions to fully implement thin client infrastructure to support classified computer processing and upgrade to Internet Protocol-based secure video telecommunications and voice capability no later than March 2012. The protected distribution systems will be installed to protect classified computing connections during non-operations hours.
Accountability.
USAID developed a local inventory and labeling mechanism that resulted in 100 percent accountability of classified hardware, printers, and hard disk drives. All stand-alone computing devices were removed from the operational environment in July 2011.
Training and Awareness.
The Chief Information Security Office and the Office of Security training coordinators jointly revamped initial and annual refresher training and tracking mechanisms. A baseline, automated training program will be developed, customized and implemented throughout the Agency, aimed at increasing awareness, automating annual training, and tracking and sending training reminders to users.
Information Security. Under Executive Order 13526, training has been developed for Original Classification Authorities (OCA). The training is designed to ensure OCAs are familiar with their roles and responsibilities in the classification, safeguarding, and declassification of classified national security information. Individuals authorized to hand-carry classified materials must carry with them a Form AID500-7, and a Courier Authorization Card. To ensure the safeguarding, control, and accountability of classified material and courier cards, effectively October 15, 2011, the Office of Security is the only office authorized to issue Courier Authorization Cards to USAID-designated couriers.
Portable Electronic Devices (PED).
USAID developed a new policy which encompasses a risk-management approach that combines the use of security technology products with user awareness and procedural controls and measures to minimize the vulnerabilities inherent with PEDs.
Counterintelligence and Insider Threat.
As outlined in Executive Order 13587, USAID developed an Insider Threat program called Structural Reforms to Improve the Security of Classified Networks and the Responsible Sharing and Safeguarding of Classified Information.
Actions Remaining
Culture. In response to assessments by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence and OIG, USAID formed a steering committee to oversee, recommend, and guide the Agency's unified activities to address, direct and improve protection, safeguard, administration, accountability, inventory, and effective use of classified information and systems. The target completion date is June 2012.
Capability.
USAID is soliciting expertise and input from all Agency security offices, business units, and bureaus to assure policies, culture, and activities support Agency business goals and objectives, encompass all 10 security domains, and result in well-rounded, vetted, and unified actions across the Agency.
Competency.
USAID is reviewing strategy to align with Department of Defense 8570 Information Assurance training requirements to increase, train, and retain well-qualified, knowledgeable information assurance and IT staff. Classified equipment issue, safeguard, and protection responsibility will be assigned at the highest level in each USAID bureau. The target implementation date is June 2012. Agency policies related to personnel, physical, and industrial security programs; counterintelligence program; and PEDs are under technical review. USAID expects to formally approve them by June 2012. In addition, USAID will implement an Insider Threat Detection and Prevention program under Executive Order 13587. |
|
Url: |
Url Link
|
|
Archive: |
Archive Link
http://archive.is/g7f7Q |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title: |
WikiLeaks Publication Wikileaks: The GIFiles |
|
Concerning: |
"WikiLeaks Publication |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title: |
Transcript | US v Pfc. Manning, Article 39(a) Session, 03/16/12 |
|
Author: |
Alexa O'Brien |
|
Title: |
Journalist |
|
Concerning: |
"United States v. Pfc. Bradley Manning |
|
|
|
Archive Link |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title: |
APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL (Local Rule 46(c)) by Andrew Peterson for US.[998799949] [11-5151] Andrew Peterson |
|
Concerning: |
"Twitter 2703(d), 2703(d) Orders, Grand Jury |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title: |
Case Assignment History Report US District Court Eastern District of Virginia Report Date 4/11/13 |
|
Author: |
Ivan Davis |
|
Title: |
United States Magistrate Judge |
|
Authoring or Creator Agency: |
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
|
Concerning: |
"2703(d) Orders Under Seal in EDVA |
|
|
