United States vs. Manning

A timeline of the U.S. investigation between 2006 to 2013

  • submit to reddit
 
2011-01-19
 
On January 18, 2011, defense was notified that PFC Manning at the direction of XXXXXXXXXX, was placed in suicide risk. This decision was made over the recommendations of XXXXXXXXXX and the defense appointed XXXXXXXXXX. When PFC Manning was being ordered to surrender his clothes as part of the unnecessary suicide risk, the Brig made the decision to videotape this event along with an interrogation of PFC Manning by XXXXXXXXXX and others. On 19 January 2011, the defense filed a preservation of evidence request with the government and a request for the production of the video. The government has yet to respond to the defense request. The defense believes the video will support PFC Manning's claim of unlawful pretrial punishment.
  Name(s:) David Coombs
  Title: civilian defense counsel
Concerning: United States v. Pfc. Bradley Manning, Unlawful Pretrial Confinement, Article 13
Url: Url Link
 
 
4.) On 18 January 2011, over the recommendation of Capt. Hocter and the defense psychiatrist, Capt. Brian Moore, CWO4 Averhart placed me under suicide risk. The suicide risk means that I sit in my cell for 24 hours a day. I am stripped of all clothing with the exception of my underwear. My prescription eyeglasses are taken away from me. I am forced to sit in essential blindness with the exception of the times that I am reading or given limited television privileges. During those times, my glasses are returned to me. Additionally, there is a guard sitting outside my cell watching me at all times.
Concerning: United States v. Pfc. Bradley Manning, Unlawful Pretrial Confinement, Article 13
Url: Url Link
 
 
a. The video of PFC Manning being ordered to surrender his clothing at the direction of XXXXXXXXXX and his subsequent interrogation on 18 January 2011. Given the fact the defense filed a preservation of evidence request on 19 January 2011 - nearly one year ago - the government has no excuse for not providing the video . See Appendix A. The video is clearly within the possession of the government and should have already been produced. The government has responded that it 'will provide all matters requested that are it is possession no later than 2 December 2011.'
  Name(s:) David Coombs
  Title: civilian defense counsel
Concerning: United States v. Pfc. Bradley Manning, Unlawful Pretrial Confinement, Article 13
Url: Url Link
 
database built by Alexa O'Brien and Shoofly Solutions