|
|
|
|
|
The XXXXXXXXX is relevant to this appeal for three principal reasons. First, it establishes that the sealing of the documents at issue here is XXXXXXXXXX. These documents were likely sealed in December 2010 or January 2011, meaning that XXXXXXXXXX.
Second, XXXXXXXXXX illustrates the inadequacy of the public docketing here. Neither XXXXXXXXX is included on the public docket. As a result, it is impossible for Movants-Appellants of the public to know about them. In fact, because XXXXXXXXX, the public still does not know about it, in violation of this Court's caselaw XXXXXXXXX.
Finally, that XXXXXXXXXX further demonstrates XXXXXXXXXX misunderstanding of this Court's caselaw concerning when documents can be sealed XXXXXXXXXX. XXXXXXXXXX. Indeed, even the XXXXXXXXXX November 10 order was not XXXXXXXXXX. |
| |
Name(s:) |
Steven Ragland, John Kenneth Zwerling, John DeWitt Cline, Hillary Collyer, Nina Jean Ginsberg, K.C. Maxwell, Cindy Cohn, Aden Fine, Rebecca Kim Glenberg, Marcia Hofman, Lee Tien |
| |
Title: |
Lawyer for Jacob Appelbaum, Lawyer Rop Gonggrijp, Lawyer Birgitta Jonsdottir |
|
Concerning: |
Twitter 2703(d), 2703(d) Orders, Grand Jury |
|
Url: |
Url Link
|
|
Title: |
SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITIES (FRAP 28(j)) by Appellants Jacob Appelbaum, Rop Gonggrijp and Birgitta Jonsdottir. [998961863]. [11-5151] Aden Fine |
|
Concerning: |
"Twitter 2703(d), 2703(d) Orders, Grand Jury |
|
|
