|
|
|
|
|
Defendants also employ a false dichotomy between lawyers who already have security clearances and those who do not, which does not apply to the undersigned. If a lawyer with a security clearance published classified information from Wikileaks, he could lose his security clearance, because the U.S. Government considers classified information to remain classified even if it has been leaked. (See, e.g., Defs.' Obj. at 4 n.3 (discussing the situation faced by Guantanamo detainees' counsel).) Similarly, if the undersigned obtains and publishes classified information, he could be denied a security clearance when he applies for one in the future, because the same adjudicative guidelines apply to both scenarios. It is nonsensical to suggest that a security official will not consider anything an applicant for a clearance did before holding a clearance because he did not have a clearance at the time. |
| |
Name(s:) |
Kelly McClanahan |
|
Concerning: |
Mobley versus CIA FOIA, Global Intelligence Files, Stratfor, GI Files |
|
Url: |
Url Link
|
|
Title: |
Re: Insight- Sharif Mobley |
|
Author: |
Scott Stewart, Aaron Colvin, Fred Burton |
|
Authoring or Creator Agency: |
Stratfor |
|
|
|
Archive Link |
|
