United States vs. Manning

A timeline of the U.S. investigation between 2006 to 2013

  • submit to reddit
 
2012-04-17
 
Further, that the HQDA [Headquarters, Department of the Army is the executive part of the Department of the Army at the seat of Government] file related to the 17 April 2012 request be produced under R.C.M. 701(a)(2) and 701(a)(6).

[...]

3. The Defense does not request any witnesses be produced for this motion.[FOOTNOTE 1 The Defense requests the testimony of Ambassador Patrick Kennedy for the purposes of this motion if the Government maintains that the damage assessment items listed for the DOS within paragraph 16, infra, do not exist.] The Defense requests that this Court consider the following evidence in support of this motion:

a. Appellate Exhibits VIII [8], XXVI [26] XXXI [31], XXXVI [36], XLIX [49], XLVIII [49], and LXVIII [68] b. Unofficial Transcript, 23 February 2012 c. Attachment A (Department of the Army Memorandum dated 17 April 2012) d. Attachment B (Email from Ashden Fein, 17 April 2012).
  Name(s:) David Coombs
  Title: civilian defense counsel
Concerning: United States v. Pfc. Bradley Manning
Url: Url Link
 
database built by Alexa O'Brien and Shoofly Solutions