United States vs. Manning

A timeline of the U.S. investigation between 2006 to 2013

  • submit to reddit
Archive Link
Earlier today, Colonel Carl R. Coffman Jr., denied the defense's request to conduct oral depositions of nine essential witnesses. These same witnesses were requested by the defense at the Article 32 hearing, but denied by Lieutenant Colonel Paul Almanza. Each of the requested witnesses would have testified concerning whether the charged information was or was not classified and whether there was any harm to national security from this information becoming public.

Colonel Coffman determined that the difficulty, expense, and/or effect on military operations outweighed the significance of the expected testimony. This determination is difficult to comprehend given the nature of the charges against PFC Manning. Today's decision is yet another example of the government improperly impeding the defense's access to essential witnesses.

Based upon Colonel Coffman's decision, the defense intends to renew its request to depose these witnesses with the General Court-Martial Convening Authority, Major General Michael S. Linnington, and, if necessary, with the military judge.
  Name(s:) David Coombs
  Title: civilian defense counsel
Concerning: United States v. Pfc. Bradley Manning
Url: Url Link
Archive: http://archive.is/1PAXZ
Archive Link
The Army says Col. Carl Coffman sent his recommendation Wednesday to Maj. Gen. Michael Linnington, commander of the Military District of Washington. Linnington will decide whether to order a trial for Pfc. Bradley Manning.

Coffman concurred with the presiding officer at Manning's preliminary hearing last month. The 24-year-old Crescent, Okla., native faces 22 counts, including aiding the enemy.
  Agency(ies): Associated Press, AP
Concerning: United States v. Pfc. Bradley Manning
Url: Url Link
Archive: http://archive.is/eEgaF
database built by Alexa O'Brien and Shoofly Solutions